Socket benchmark without httplib
26 March 2008
05:50
as Python
Poorly coded benchmark sample that uses sockets directly and sadly gives the same results as with httplib.
| 1 | import socket |
|---|---|
| 2 | from time import time |
| 3 | |
| 4 | class SimpleHttp(object): |
| 5 | def __init__(self, host='127.0.0.1', port=5984, shared=False): |
| 6 | self.host = host |
| 7 | self.port = port |
| 8 | self.shared = shared |
| 9 | if shared: |
| 10 | self.socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 11 | self.socket.connect((host, port)) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | def getline(self, sock): |
| 14 | buf = '' |
| 15 | while buf[-2:] != '\r\n': |
| 16 | buf += sock.recv(1) |
| 17 | return buf[:-2] |
| 18 | |
| 19 | def readheaders(self, sock): |
| 20 | done = False |
| 21 | while not done: |
| 22 | line = self.getline(sock) |
| 23 | if len(line) == 0: |
| 24 | done = True |
| 25 | |
| 26 | def chunkeddata(self, sock): |
| 27 | done = False |
| 28 | buf = '' |
| 29 | while not done: |
| 30 | line = self.getline(sock) |
| 31 | size = int(line, 16) |
| 32 | if size == 0: |
| 33 | self.getline(sock) |
| 34 | done = True |
| 35 | else: |
| 36 | data = '' |
| 37 | while len(data) < size: |
| 38 | data += sock.recv(size - len(data)) |
| 39 | buf += data |
| 40 | self.getline(sock) |
| 41 | return buf |
| 42 | |
| 43 | def benchmark(self, req='/', n=10): |
| 44 | for i in xrange(10): |
| 45 | if self.shared: |
| 46 | s = self.socket |
| 47 | else: |
| 48 | s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| 49 | s.connect((self.host, self.port)) |
| 50 | |
| 51 | start = time() |
| 52 | s.send("GET %s HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: %s\r\n\r\n" % (req, self.host)) |
| 53 | headers = self.readheaders(s) |
| 54 | data = self.chunkeddata(s) |
| 55 | print ' (%2d): GET %6.2fms' % (i, (time() - start) * 1000) |
| 56 | if not self.shared: |
| 57 | s.close() |
| 58 | |
| 59 | if __name__ == '__main__': |
| 60 | bm1 = SimpleHttp() |
| 61 | print "Simple benchmark:" |
| 62 | bm1.benchmark() |
| 63 | |
| 64 | bm2 = SimpleHttp(shared=True) |
| 65 | print "\nShared benchmark:" |
| 66 | bm2.benchmark() |
Comments
-
Dave says:
26 March 2008
05:51Whoops, that xrange should be xrange(n), not xrange(10).
